Letters: Writing About Science | The Nation

Readers disagree with criticism of latest opinion items in The New York Instances in regards to the origins of Covid-19 and the general public well being response to it.

In a latest science opinion piece, Gregg Gonsalves and John P. Moore decry different such items by Zeynep Tufekci and Alina Chan, whom they characterize as biased and insufficiently knowledgeable on questions of virus origins and public well being administration [“The New York Times Is Failing Its Readers Badly on Covid,” TheNation.com, June 21]. 

Regarding Dr. Chan’s dialogue of Covid origins, Gonsalves and Moore state that “the Instances’ science and politics reporters have coated all facets of this saga objectively and pretty.” They assist this with two hyperlinks to the Instances from greater than a yr in the past, one in every of which is a flimsy report suggesting that raccoon canines have been the intermediate species within the transmission of the virus to people. Raccoon canines are not talked about by proponents of the market state of affairs, together with within the January 2024 letter Gonsalves and Moore cite as “the proof” of their assertion that “the preponderance of the proof implies that the virus jumped from an animal to a human host in a Wuhan ‘moist market.’” The three opinion items they cite in assist of their assertions have been all primarily based on two papers revealed within the journal Science two years in the past, which have been discredited by more moderen genetic, geolocalization, statistical, and epidemiological research. These are cited in Dr. Chan’s unprecedentedly data-rich (for a common newspaper) New York Instances essay. 

On what foundation have Drs. Gonsalves and Moore appointed themselves arbiters of what constitutes “all facets of this saga”? They state that Dr. Chan, regardless of her unquestionably citing more moderen research than they’ve, has exhibited a “science be damned” angle to the Covid origins query, and the Instances, by having “revived” the lab leak speculation (which they acknowledge is a viable risk) has achieved in order nicely. By impugning continued dialogue of this very important query whereas crediting the opinion items of 1 facet and ridiculing the good-faith presentation by a critical advocate of the opposite, Gonsalves and Moore have achieved a disservice to all of us.

Stuart A. Newman
pleasantville, ny

Present Subject

Felipe C. Cabello
hawthorne, ny

The writers are, respectively, a professor of cell biology and anatomy and a professor emeritus of pathology, microbiology, and immunology at New York Medical Faculty in Valhalla, New York. Dr. Newman is a coauthor with Tina Stevens of Biotech Juggernaut: Hope, Hype, and Hidden Agendas of Entrepreneurial BioScience (Routledge, 2019). Dr. Cabello made key early contributions to DNA splicing expertise and was the chair of our college’s federally mandated Institutional Biosafety Committee for greater than a decade.

As most readers of The Nation absolutely know, The New York Instances fails its readers on quite a few points, from science to politics, and has achieved so repeatedly. So it’s with The Nation on this case, which is disappointing. Science just isn’t a priesthood however slightly a neighborhood of investigators engaged in analysis, discourse, and criticism. As an establishment, it’s no kind of fragile than another of our social establishments, lots of that are at the moment present process extreme stresses, together with training, justice, and so on. Science doesn’t stand aside, a lot as we would want it so.

The very last thing that the establishment of science wants proper now’s “pontification” by members of its priesthood. One is reminded of these yard indicators sporting liberal shibboleths, one in every of which is “Imagine the science.” Science has to earn that perception, that belief. At the start of the AIDS disaster, some among the many management cadre of public well being failed in that respect; to his credit score Dr. Anthony Fauci has acknowledged as a lot. That humility might be a part of his legacy.

Professor Zeynep Tufekci is that rara avis, a public mental who contributes to each the scientific literature and to considerate discourse in lots of fields. Readers of The Nation could want to revisit her 2017 e book, Twitter and Tear Fuel, on the successes, and failures, of the social and political mobilizations made extra attainable by rising info applied sciences.

At the moment, the general public is ill-served by efforts within the scientific neighborhood to shut ranks prematurely round paradigms and insurance policies that by rights and actually are repeatedly evolving, a lot as are info applied sciences. Professor Tufekci is merely declaring how science itself is discredited when its gatekeepers themselves violate the norms of scientific openness and humility.

Thomas Yemm
big apple, ny

The author is an adjunct teacher of sociology on the New York College Faculty of Skilled Research.

Gonsalves and Moore Reply

Newman and Cabello are among the many minority of biologists who consider the Covid-19 pandemic arose from a lab leak. They accuse us of not offering adequate proof for our opinion {that a} extra seemingly origin is a zoonotic occasion whereby SARS-CoV-2 was transmitted from an unidentified animal to a human, maybe twice, in a Wuhan moist market. When writing an essay for a generalist web site corresponding to The Nation, it isn’t the norm to supply a number of hyperlinks to peer-reviewed literature or dependable on-line sources. However we’re blissful to take action right here. These linked sources assist the zoonotic switch speculation and/or counter the notion {that a} lab leak occurred.

Scientists finding out Covid have persistently up to date their views as new info has emerged. In contrast, the proponents of the lab leak principle have provided no new proof to assist their claims, and their primary arguments have been roundly debunked. Whereas the origin of SARS-CoV-2 could by no means be identified, the preponderance of the proof helps a zoonotic supply. If new proof emerges, we’ll revise our views.

The hazards of the evidence-lite lab leak speculation are more and more obvious. The ultra-right Heritage Basis just lately issued an inflammatory manifesto for authorized motion in opposition to China over the pandemic. The authors took it as established proven fact that the pandemic arose from a lab leak and dismissed the zoonosis speculation on extraordinarily doubtful grounds. Virologists are being accused of mendacity, corruption, or participation in a cover-up. 

A peer-reviewed paper quickly to look within the Journal of Virology will define how that is damaging the power of the scientific neighborhood to organize for the subsequent viral pandemic, how the demonization of scientists is driving them away from work on viruses with pandemic potential, and the way it’s more and more tough to influence the subsequent era of scientists to change into virologists. Being much less ready for the subsequent pandemic ought to concern us all. Viruses threaten humanity, not the virologists and the opposite scientists world wide engaged on pandemic threats.

Gregg Gonsalves
new haven, ct

John P. Moore
big apple metropolis

Can we rely on you?

Within the coming election, the destiny of our democracy and elementary civil rights are on the poll. The conservative architects of Undertaking 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian imaginative and prescient throughout all ranges of presidency if he ought to win.

We’ve already seen occasions that fill us with each dread and cautious optimism—all through all of it, The Nation has been a bulwark in opposition to misinformation and an advocate for daring, principled views. Our devoted writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Tales like these and the one you simply learn are very important at this essential juncture in our nation’s historical past. Now greater than ever, we’d like clear-eyed and deeply reported unbiased journalism to make sense of the headlines and type truth from fiction. Donate right now and be a part of our 160-year legacy of talking fact to energy and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

All through 2024 and what’s seemingly the defining election of our lifetimes, we’d like your assist to proceed publishing the insightful journalism you depend on.

Thanks,
The Editors of The Nation

Our Readers

Our readers typically submit letters to the editor which might be value publishing, in print and/or on-line.

Gregg Gonsalves



Nation public well being correspondent Gregg Gonsalves is the codirector of the International Well being Justice Partnership and an affiliate professor of epidemiology on the Yale Faculty of Public Well being.

John P. Moore

John P. Moore is a professor of microbiology and immunology at Weill Cornell Medication in New York Metropolis.

Extra from The Nation

Rural America looms giant within the 2024 election. So why is it such a small piece of the Progressive Caucus agenda?

Editorial

/

Anthony Flaccavento

A century in the past, labor schools remodeled American unions. It’s time to carry them again.

Characteristic

/

Daniel Judt

When Congress handed the Immigration Act of 1924 a century in the past, The Nation issued a prescient warning to its readers.

Editorial

/

Richard Kreitner

Can a trigger nonetheless be simply, even when atrocities have been dedicated on its behalf?

Remark

/

Bruce Robbins

A dialog with Rachel Somerstein about her new e book, Invisible Labor: The Untold Story of the Cesarean Part.

Q&A

/

Sara Franklin

Whilst their colleagues in Gaza are intentionally massacred, Western journalists proceed to play together with the IDF.

Séamus Malekafzali




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *