Finish the Persecution of Julian Assange

The fifth anniversary of Assange’s imprisonment could be a great day for the Biden administration to finish this sordid saga—earlier than it ends the First Modification.

Julian Assange gestures to the media from a police automobile on the day of his arrest in 2019. (Jack Taylor / Getty Photos)

5 years in the past right this moment, April 11, 2019, London’s Metropolitan Police entered the Ecuadorian embassy in London to arrest WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. For seven years, Assange had lived contained in the embassy. The left-wing administration of Rafael Correa had granted the journalist political asylum. Though the preliminary extradition request got here from Sweden, which claimed that it wanted to query Assange over allegations of sexual assault, he feared that the US would prosecute him for journalistic actions. Ecuador discovered Assange’s considerations believable.

Assange requested that Sweden present assurances that it will not extradite him to the US—a precept identified in worldwide regulation as “non-refoulement.” Based on the previous UN particular rapporteur on torture Nils Melzer, “On the planet of diplomatic relations, the truth that Stockholm refused to concern a non-refoulement assure to Assange spoke a transparent language and left no room for misunderstandings.”

Present Subject

As a substitute of permitting Assange secure passage, British police spent thousands and thousands of kilos surrounding the embassy. If the WikiLeaks founder left, the UK deliberate to arrest him. It even pressured Sweden to not withdraw the extradition request or interview Assange within the embassy. And when Sweden did shut the investigation with out charging Assange, the UK, on the request of the Trump White Home, introduced its personal expenses towards Assange for leaping bail. Assange was trapped.

Correa’s successor Lenin Moreno sought nearer ties with the US and lurched to the precise. He revoked Assange’s asylum and invited police into Ecuador’s sovereign embassy. As press gathered outdoors, police hauled Assange out of the embassy that had been his involuntary residence. The WikiLeaks writer, clearly in in poor health well being, held up a duplicate of Gore Vidal’s Historical past of the Nationwide Safety State. As police compelled the journalist right into a van, he advised onlookers that the “UK should resist.”

Formally, British police have been arresting Assange for the misdemeanor offense of leaping bail. However the extraordinary spectacle of their coming into an embassy to grab a journalist was not the outgrowth of an overzealous method to misdemeanors. That very same day, the US unsealed an indictment towards Assange. Assange was then “additional arrested” in relation to a US extradition request. A month later, the Trump administration would increase the indictment, bringing much more expenses towards Assange. It was exactly what Assange feared when he sought refuge within the embassy.

Assange at the moment faces 18 felony counts—carrying a possible complete of 175 years in jail: one depend of conspiring to violate the Laptop Fraud and Abuse Act and 17 counts of violating the Espionage Act. All the costs stem from his receiving and publishing categorized paperwork given to Wikileaks by whistleblower Chelsea Manning.

This huge cache of secrets and techniques gave the world an unprecedented take a look at US overseas coverage, together with its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The paperwork uncovered battle crimes, human rights violations, and abuses of energy. In addition they confirmed how the US seeks to evade accountability for its crimes. In Spain, it tried to strain the judiciary into dropping an investigation into the killing of a Spanish journalist by US troopers in Iraq. In Italy, it tried to strain the judiciary into dropping a prosecution of CIA brokers for “renditions”—i.e., kidnapping.

Whereas the US calls for impunity for its personal crimes, it’s cruel towards those that expose them. That is evidenced by the US authorities’s response to those revelations. Whistleblower Manning was held in pretrial situations that seemingly constituted torture after which sentenced to 35 years in jail (Obama commuted her sentence after Manning spent six years in jail).

With its arrest of Assange, the US authorities confirmed that it was not happy with merely prosecuting whistleblowers. It was now coming for journalists.

Meet the New Boss

Each main civil liberties, press freedom, and human rights group is urging the US to drop the costs. The mainstream papers who labored with Wikileaks—together with The New York Occasions and The Guardian—have equally expressed alarm. A rising variety of members of Congress in each events have additionally known as for the costs to be dropped on press freedom grounds. The United Nations particular rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression, Irene Khan, known as on the US to finish the prosecution.

The US’s authorized case marks the primary time the Espionage Act has been used towards a journalist or writer. Whistleblowers from Daniel Ellsberg to Edward Snowden have been charged below the Espionage Act. However whereas previous administrations had threatened the press below the act, in follow there remained a crimson line nobody was prepared to cross.

The Obama administration waged a vicious battle on whistleblowers. It normalized using the Espionage Act towards journalists’ sources. And it inspired different nations to prosecute Assange. However it resisted strain from the FBI and the CIA to carry expenses towards Assange. This was not out of a love for WikiLeaks. As a substitute, it was due to the New York Occasions drawback. Any authorized precedent set by prosecuting Assange would create a precedent permitting the prosecution of The New York Occasions or different extra mainstream retailers. Obama merely wasn’t prepared to doubtlessly criminalize nationwide safety reporting simply to get Assange.

The Trump administration didn’t share these considerations. When WikiLeaks printed secret CIA hacking instruments, Trump’s CIA was enraged to the purpose that the company plotted to kidnap or kill Assange. Trump’s Division of Justice dusted off the case towards Assange for publishing the Manning revelations.

Trump’s antipathy towards press freedom was clear. However Biden has been president for over two years now and his administration has sought to proceed the extradition, even going as far as to attraction hostile rulings.

Criminalizing Investigative Journalism

Regardless of the worldwide outcry, the US and UK proceed to barrel forward with the extradition and supreme prosecution. In 2021, British Decide Vanessa Baraitser rejected the US’s extradition on grounds that it was oppressive. Whereas that was a victory for Assange, Baraitser additionally rejected all of his press freedom claims. As a substitute of strolling away, Washington appealed this determination. The unique ruling was thrown out; Assange’s attraction rights have been denied, and his extradition was ordered. Removed from closing the authorized saga, it opened a second act. His attorneys have been now capable of attraction Baraitser‘s rejection of their press freedom arguments

In February, for the primary time in 4 years, UK judges have been compelled to confront the considerations about press freedom which have animated world outrage. For 2 days earlier than the UK Excessive Court docket, Assange’s authorized group argued that he was a journalist being persecuted for exposing state criminality. Though an iron cage was current within the courtroom for Assange to sit down in, he was too sick to attend the proceedings.

Along with counting on technical authorized arguments, British prosecutors argued that Assange was not a journalist. Their arguments have been closely based mostly on declarations from the US prosecutors. Because of this, their feedback will be thought of a preview of what the US authorities may say if Assange ever reaches US shores.

Based on US and UK prosecutors, as a result of WikiLeaks solicited others to “steal” nationwide protection data or commit hacking, Assange shouldn’t be a journalist. In different phrases, the mere existence of WikiLeaks as web site that publishes leaked data constituted solicitation. Thus, if journalists announce their willingness to publish secrets and techniques which are within the public curiosity, they’re soliciting felony conduct. Not solely does the US case towards Assange search to criminalize easy publishing of secrets and techniques—if accepted, these claims would remodel daring journalism right into a felony conspiracy.

In March, the Excessive Court docket rejected the majority of Assange’s arguments. In a 66-page ruling, UK judges explicitly rejected the concept the costs towards Assange violated his proper to free expression. But additionally they granted Assange a brief reprieve in an effort to file restricted appeals based mostly on considerations that the US authorities might attempt to argue that he doesn’t have First Modification rights as a overseas nationwide and the shortage of assurances that the US received’t search the loss of life penalty (none of the present expenses carry the loss of life penalty, however there are considerations new capital expenses may very well be filed). Disturbingly, the judges said that the US might keep away from an attraction altogether if it provided assurances based mostly on these considerations.

Whereas Assange has but to face trial in the US, he has now spent 5 years confined in His Majesty’s Jail Belmarsh—a excessive safety jail reserved for many who pose a menace to public order or nationwide safety. Assange’s well being continues to deteriorate. He suffered a ministroke in October 2021 and, extra not too long ago, damaged ribs resulting from a persistent cough.

On the similar time that folks across the globe are condemning the persecution of Assange, the Biden administration has made hypocritical pronouncements about its help for press freedom. Biden can’t have it each methods.

In search of to punish a journalist for publications that have been clearly within the public curiosity is a grave affront to press freedom. WikiLeaks’ function in exposing state criminality must be lauded, not prosecuted. However no matter your views about Assange’s explicit model of journalism, if he’s placed on trial in the US, the First Modification can even be within the dock. After 5 years, it’s time for the Biden administration to finish this sordid saga—earlier than it ends the First Modification.

Can we depend on you?

Within the coming election, the destiny of our democracy and basic civil rights are on the poll. The conservative architects of Venture 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian imaginative and prescient throughout all ranges of presidency if he ought to win.

We’ve already seen occasions that fill us with each dread and cautious optimism—all through all of it, The Nation has been a bulwark towards misinformation and an advocate for daring, principled views. Our devoted writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Tales like these and the one you simply learn are very important at this vital juncture in our nation’s historical past. Now greater than ever, we’d like clear-eyed and deeply reported unbiased journalism to make sense of the headlines and type reality from fiction. Donate right this moment and be a part of our 160-year legacy of talking fact to energy and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

All through 2024 and what’s seemingly the defining election of our lifetimes, we’d like your help to proceed publishing the insightful journalism you depend on.

Thanks,
The Editors of The Nation

Chip Gibbons



Chip Gibbons is coverage director of Defending Rights & Dissent. A journalist and researcher specializing in the US nationwide safety state, Chip is at the moment engaged on The Imperial Bureau, forthcoming from Verso Books. Based mostly closely on archival analysis and paperwork obtained by means of the Freedom of Info Act, it tells the historical past of FBI political surveillance and explores the function of home surveillance within the making of the US nationwide safety state.

Extra from The Nation

A century in the past, labor faculties remodeled American unions. It’s time to carry them again.

Function

/

Daniel Judt

Rural America looms massive within the 2024 election. So why is it such a small piece of the Progressive Caucus agenda?

Editorial

/

Anthony Flaccavento

When Congress handed the Immigration Act of 1924 a century in the past, The Nation issued a prescient warning to its readers.

Editorial

/

Richard Kreitner

Can a trigger nonetheless be simply, even when atrocities have been dedicated on its behalf?

Remark

/

Bruce Robbins

A dialog with Rachel Somerstein about her new guide, Invisible Labor: The Untold Story of the Cesarean Part.

Q&A

/

Sara Franklin

At the same time as their colleagues in Gaza are intentionally massacred, Western journalists proceed to play together with the IDF.

Séamus Malekafzali




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *